Pages in this Folder:
Related Folders:
See also Department Site Map
Support Provided by
Toronto Parks and Trees Foundation
This website has received support from celos.ca through the Trillium foundation.
Publications
 |
 |
 |
 |
Comments?
For the basics, see
- Website & Privacy Policies
- How To Get Involved
- The Role of the Park
Search options:
Department Site Map
Custodians:
Printer friendly version
Community commentary (3)
March 17, 2010
K. W. wrote:
To Whom It May Concern:
I remember vividly and fondly one frosty New Year's Eve when we had a campfire beside the ice rink on a very cold, clear evening. It was so simple to arrange for the fire permit and was that small fire ever popular! We had many passersby and skaters come and join in happily. I recall one young Chinese couple who were there on their first day in Canada! Everyone welcomed them and they raved about what a wonderful city they had come to. People who had been total strangers learned they were neighbours and became friends. There was more than the warmth of a bright fire, the warmth of friendly people will be remembered by all for a long time. I am very thankful that such sa small thing was permitted in my public park. I hope it continues.
March 21, 2010
G. D. wrote:
It's gotta be free
first published at http://mudandmusings.blogspot.com, January 3, 2008
Cob Courtyard Wall, Dufferin Grove Park
- The time: summer 2005;
- The concept: create an earthen sculpture in a downtown Toronto park that would serve as a gathering place and summer kitchen;
- The method: offer free, ongoing, no sign-up fee, no commitment, earthen building workshops to volunteers all summer long, providing training to the participants and helpers for the structure;
- The partners: Toronto's department of recreation, me, and a group of core volunteers.
"Come get muddy" was the call, an invitation to any and all who wanted to try their hand at earthen building. And people did. They wandered by, asked "What's this all about?", and we said, "Come try it out and see!"
Shoes and socks came off, and feet jumped into the mud, mixing sand, straw, clay and water together to form a building material known as "cob". Then they picked up the mud, slapped it on the wall, and started sculpting.
Some stayed for a few minutes, a couple hours, contributing a little bit of labour and getting to play in the mud. Others were so beguiled by the project that they came back daily or for the whole summer. Many took on leadership roles, leading different aspects of creation, like cupboards, arched windows, the fireplace.
By summer's end, approximately 500 people worked on the creation of the cob wall in Dufferin Grove Park. By any measure, the project was a resounding success. First of all, it was completed on time and on a shoestring budget.
The measure by which it was most successful though, is in the quantity of attendees, and in the quality of their connection to the project and to their fellow attendees. This, in my opinion, was directly attributable to the following aspects of the program:
- Free: no sign-up fee means participating without having to prioritize attending this vs buying food or clothes or having spending money. Free means not having to identify yourself as someone who cannot afford to attend. Free equalizes the playing field;
- Drop-in: no commitment to attendance means showing up when you really want to be there, ready to learn and contribute. People who are forced to attend because they signed up are not enjoyable to be around and do not contribute positively to the project. Not having to give your name allows the participation of people who need anonymity in order to stay safe;
- Ongoing: knowing that a program is on offer for a period of time allows potential attendees to "get there when they get there"; it allows for life to intervene without compromising their chance to be involved;
- Creative input: whoever was there that day had a hand in making creative decisions about the sculpture, and then they were able to make their ideas reality right then and there.
These measures allowed people who would normally shy away from community classes or projects to participate to their satisfaction in this one. There were moms with babies in slings, newly arrived immigrants, refugees, people who did not speak English, retirees who live around the corner, dads, kids on a break from the playground, people from across town, and men transitioning into civilian life after serving time, and their attendance can be directly attributed to these four aspects of the project.
That all of this could happen was the result of a fruitful partnership between the City of Toronto Recreation staff and me, the project organizer. The recreation staff took this to be part of their mandate to provide free, drop-in activities. They expanded the boundaries of "recreation" to include activities that draw in many more newcomers, across cultural lines. That made the park so much livelier, and this drop-in activity resulted in a permanent, useful and much-loved addition to the park.
Forming a project around these principles requires something very important from the organizers/administrators: trust. They need trust that people are able to decide for themselves what is best for them, trust that people can be counted on to do good work, trust that people will come and take advantage of an opportunity presented to them.
A program free of coercion is one that truly honours the participants, and one that will reap benefits well beyond the original expectations of the organizers. Do we have the enough trust in each other to offer this of ourselves and our city?
From Ombudsman Fiona Crean, to all those who e-mailed her back in February:
From G.T. to the ombudsman, March 14 2010:
How do you say that's not my job in Bureaucrateese? If bureaucrats were creative people they would see that an issue that raised so much concern with the public should be part of their mandate and not simply weasel their way out.
A real response to my and others letters would be that the city was going to do everything in its power to ensure that the vitality of Dufferin Grove Park would not be diminished by these staffing changes. If the Ombudsman's office was really an ally of the people of this city, you would have taken the real concerns of people into account and found answers from parks department that would allay their fear. You would have laid out steps that they could take individually and collectively if they saw that in fact their fears were coming to be a reality. As an ombudsman, you're no Michael Moore.
From K.S. to the editor, dufferinpark.ca, July 21, 2010
My partner and I would like to thank the friends of Dufferin Grove, staff and volunteers for their hard work and success in making the park such a wonderful community space. It takes creativity and vision and most of all hard work to make such a great space. As child care advocates we know how tough it can be to get government to listen. Please let us know if we should write to our local councillor (Pantalone) or Janet Davis or whoever, to push for the City to back Friends of Dufferin Grove 100%. Frankly it should be a pilot model for the other parks.